Showing posts with label Mormons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mormons. Show all posts

03 April 2010

Florida: Genealogy beyond the Internet, April 14

Genealogy beyond the Internet is the program at the next meeting of the Jewish Genealogical Society of Palm Beach County on Wednesday, April 14.

The meeting runs from 12.30-3pm, with a brick wall session, business meeting and main program, at the South County Civic Center, Delray Beach. Members are free; others, $5. SIG groups for Hungary and Ukraine will meet from 11.30am-12.15pm.

Mark Jacobson, Jerry Naditch and Dennis Rice will present the main program, as they discuss genealogy resources not generally available online.

Researchers tend to forget that genealogists discovered useful sources of information well before the internet existed!

The presentation will focus on several “hard copy” resources such as: vital records, grave markers, published obituaries, city directories and Social Security applications.

The speakers will demonstrate examples of source material; how and where to obtain it. They will review resources of the Family History Centers (FHC), sponsored by the Mormon Church.

Many valuable genealogical documents are available only on microfilm, which can often be ordered and read at the Boca Raton Family History Library and other Palm Beach County sites.
Submit questions in advance for the Brick Wall program.

For more information, visit the JGS of Palm Beach County.

09 March 2010

Melbourne: The Frenkel Story

It's all because of his younger son's roots project, said Israeli Ambassador to Australia Yuval Rotem, that his family discovered their history and their Australian cousins.

Speaking on the second day of the conference, Ambassador Rotem described the significant and emotional journey he and his family have taken over the past few years.

Although his surname is today Rotem, the original family name is Frenkel, and he is a seventh-generation descendant of R' Levi Yitzchak of Berdichev (the Berdichever Rebbe). But the family knew none of this.

As he put it, they were a family in which there were grandparents, the older generation didn't talk much and the younger generation didn't ask. There was no priority for the past.

When his younger son was 12, he was to create a family tree for his bar mitzvah. His older son had missed doing it when Rotem was posted to Los Angeles as the Consulate General.

No one had done it in their family - they did ask everyone. They used all the new technology, Rotem related: Internet, message boards, web sites, Pages of Testimony at Yad Vashem - always searching for the family name and place.

His paternal grandfather was born in Pyotrekov, Poland (where Israel's Chief Rabbi Israel Meir Lau had also been born). Rotem visited Lau to obtain information on his family. From the very first stage, there were interesting discoveries. His maternal side went to Palestine in the 1920s. He learned about his connection to the Berdichever Rebbe. For a secular Jew, learning he was a descendant of a famous Hassidic family was a revelation.

On his paternal side, his grandfather was the last son of 16 siblings of a very Orthodox family; he followed two brothers to Palestine in the 1920s. Twelve remained in Poland, only one survived.

That survivor moved to Australia, and although Rotem knew the man must have died, he believed there were descendants. Again, they posted messages, but discovered nothing.

Everything changed in December 2006. Rotem was to be posted to Australia. The first article written about him was in the Australian Jewish News in January 2007. The reporter was Jason Frenkel.

Rotem thanked Jason for the article and told him about his own name change. At the time, Israeli diplomats-to-be were required to change their original names to Hebrew surnames. He provided some information about the family and the town, curious to learn if the reporter's family was perhaps related.

The next day, he received a call from Jason's father, Morry Frenkel, who knew of the Petrykov connection. The two long-separated branches had found each other.

Morry and his wife Mary visited Rotem back home in Israel where - for the first time - Rotem's father (Israel Frenkel, 76) met his cousin from Melbourne.

Rotem further described that when he was in Los Angeles, his responsibilities extended to Utah, and that he also received help from the Mormons in Salt Lake City, who located his father's birth certificate.

Just last Saturday, announced Rotem, he received a phone call from three SLC researchers who had discovered hundreds of family names and were putting together a big book for him. The men will be coming to Australia to present the book, which covers some four-to-five generations of Frankels.

He stressed to the audience that his son came with the idea - a small request - that resulted in this huge achievement.

Rotem's voice broke and he took a moment to compose himself, just before describing his family's Rosh Hashana celebration at Morry's home, surrounded by so many cousins.

"This field of yours that you are so preoccupied with," said the ambassador, "is to be commended for helping people in Australia."

The first Jewish boy born after the war in Pyotrekov was named Avraham Frenkel. There is an annual reunion of the town's survivors and descendants, organized by Rabbi Lau's grandson. The last one included some 700 men, aged 30-40. Rotem described the enormous interest in these almost forgotten stories of legacy and culture.

When his grandfather left Poland in 1932, he had one photograph of his mother Esther. It was found in a shoebox and is the only known photo of his great-grandmother.

Morry Frenkel was in the audience today.

Many of today's genealogists took their first steps on this fascinating family history journey with their children's roots projects.

I know I did, and I'm not alone. If the ambassador's son had not received that assignment, the family would never have been reunited.

04 January 2010

Ancestral File: Mormon rites?

Gary Mokotoff, editor of "Nu? What's New? The E-zine of Jewish Genealogy From Avotaynu," kicked off his first issue of the new year with this information:

Ancestral File To Be Used for Mormon Rituals?

Since 1978, the Mormon Church has been encouraging genealogists, Mormon and otherwise, to contribute to Ancestral File, a database of more than 35 million people on the family trees of these genealogists. I contributed the Mokotow family tree in the 1980s and since then have confirmed, from time to time, that no Mormon rites have been performed on these individuals.

It appears the Church has had a change of heart and may be planning to posthumously baptize people whose names have been contributed by genealogists to Ancestral File. The New FamilySearch database includes all these names, which was expected. What was not expected is that the religious ordinance section of New FamilySearch shows that members of the Mokotow family have a status of “Ready.” It was confirmed that Jewish names in Ancestral File on other family trees also have a status of Ready.

Meanwhile Utah’s Senator Orrin Hatch, a Mormon, received publicity in December due to his creation of a song “Eight Days of Hanukkah.” You can hear it at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XND3Naa6N5o. This act had a significant backlash from the Jewish community. Typical was the comment, “If Senator Orrin Hatch loves Jews so much, he should intervene on their behalf to halt the wrongful posthumous baptism of Jewish dead (including Holocaust victims). It continues, despite repeated denials by the disingenuous Mormon leadership.”

Helen Radkey added in her own email to interested persons:

Please read the opening piece of the attached newsletter which claims that Ancestral File is being used for Mormon rituals. From research I supplied to Gary Mokotoff, I can verify that the claims he makes in his report on the topic are accurate. Please note the names extracted from Ancestral File that now show as "Ready" in the New Family Search are Jewish names.
Thank you, Gary and Helen. Subscribe to Gary's "Nu? What's New" at the link above.

NOTE: There are safe places for your Jewish family tree to be preserved, where your ancestors will not be subjected to such rites. The new project partnership of MyHeritage.com and Beit Hatfutsot (Museum of the Jewish People, Tel Aviv, Israel) is one, Family Tree of the Jewish People (at JewishGen.org) is another.

08 December 2009

Utah: 'Genealogical pit bull' Helen Radkey

Helen Radkey has been instrumental in uncovering posthumous baptisms of Jews in the LDS church records.

Two stories on Friday in the Salt Lake Tribune focused on her work and the new FamilySearch system that may not stop inappropriate names slipping through. Both quoted well-known Jewish genealogist Gary Mokotoff who signed the 1995 agreement between the LDS church and Jewish Holocaust groups.

"I call her the Erin Brockovich of the Mormon/Jewish controversy," says New Jersey resident Gary Mokotoff, past president of the International Association of Jewish Genealogical Societies who signed the [1995] agreement and feels indebted to Radkey for what he considers impeccable research. "You can defame her any way you want personality-wise, but she's still a whistle-blower."

The first article on Helen is here; it called her a genealogical pit bull who has both defenders and critics in the quest to eliminate what are - to Jews - distasteful Mormon proxy baptisms performed on Jewish Holocaust victims and others.

Helen has uncovered thousands of "inappropriately entered" Holocaust victims, who are then removed and re-entered again as fast as they are removed. She discovered famed Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal in the International Genealogical Index (IGI); his name was quickly removed after a major media storm.

The first article provides a glimpse of Helen's work:

Both bedrooms are piled high with box after box of file folders, evidence of her decades long drive to undermine the LDS Church's temple ritual in which living Mormons are baptized for a person who has died.

Each folder contains the name and personal information of an individual who has been posthumously baptized. She found the data through the church's Family History Library, poring over its genealogical records and looking for those people she believes ought not be there -- from Catholic saints to offshoot polygamists to infamous scoundrels such as Adolf Hitler and famous people such as President Barack Obama's mother.

Since 1993, she has garnered widespread media attention with every new find. She traveled to Rome several times to "warn" Vatican officials of the growing warmth between Utah's Mormon and Catholic leaders, reporting proxy baptisms of dead Catholics, including martyrs and saints. She alerted Jewish genealogists that Mormons were not keeping their 1995 agreement to stop baptizing Holocaust victims.

The second story by the same reporter is here, and focuses on the new system that the church hopes will thwart mischief makers, although it may not stop inappropriate names from slipping through. And the new system also hides the names of people who inappropriately submit Jewish and other names for temple rites.

The LDS Church now has in place a computer program it believes may halt -- or at least slow -- the submission of incorrect, inappropriate or dubious information into its massive collection of genealogical records.

"The new version of FamilySearch is a technological deterrent to improper submissions," LDS spokesman Scott Trotter said Thursday. "For example, users must certify that the names they are submitting are of family members."

In earlier times, the record included person who had submitted a name, along with which temple rituals had been performed for the deceased individual. Today, those details are secret and open only to church members.

Helen Radkey, the self-appointed whistle-blower on Mormon proxy baptisms, is not
convinced this will do anything but shield the identity of those she claims are
pouring American celebrities and Holocaust victims back into "temple-ready"
files.

LDS leaders and officials at the church's Family History Library declined to be interviewed for this story. They would not say whether any protocols are in place to catch people who are creating mischief by submitting names such as Thomas Edison and Simon Wiesenthal.

While some critics believe Helen has added such names herself, she denies that, as do her supporters.

"There is no reason for me to submit names," she says. "LDS Church members regularly submit names of celebrities or famous people, and names from unapproved lists, such as Jewish Holocaust victims."

Gary Mokotoff, a nationally prominent Jewish genealogist who signed the LDS Church's 1995 agreement to discontinue proxy baptisms for Holocaust victims, calls that allegation "a vicious ugly rumor designed to discredit her and she's absolutely not doing it."

Mokotoff is convinced that because Radkey is such an irritant to LDS officials, they would be the first to expose her. But they haven't.

"This has never been brought up in any discussions with the church," Mokotoff says. "The church has never publicly discredited her."

LDS officials refused to say whether they have investigated to find out who has entered inappropriate names into the system.

The continuing problem with Jewish records appearing in the LDS collection has convinced Mokotoff that LDS officials had no intention of honoring their 1995 accord.

"They could do things today and they are not doing it," he says. "The church knows who the culprits are. They say it's because of overzealous Mormons, but there has been no reprimand of overzealous Mormons."

The church would not say if it has sanctioned any members for misusing the system.

Radkey finds data in roadblock workarounds, which include confidential sources, using Family History Library terminals when previous users left without logging out, and the log-ins of Mormon friends.

Read both stories to learn more about Australian-born Helen's quest, why she does what she does, how she got started in July 1993 discovering that the Mormons had proxy baptised Catholic martyrs, and her premonition about what would be her work with Jews.

After 1995, when the church agreed to remove more than 350,000 Jewish Holocaust names from the records, she looked to see if the names were back on the list. And, by 2000, some 19,000 had again been entered.

Salt Lake City Rabbi Benny Zippel (of Congregation Bais Menachem) is distressed about the proxy baptism of Holocaust victims, and he's quoted:

Any kind of proxy baptism "is morally offensive and deeply hurtful to both the survivors of the Holocaust," he says, "as well as to the souls of those who died and laid down their lives for their faith."

However, he wanted nothing to do with Helen's efforts, as he says "I don't like nurturing or enhancing negative energy," and has had positive interaction with the LDS church leaders.

The issue is often billed as the "Jewish/Mormon controversy that won't go away." To read more about the details of agreements signed by the LDS church and more on the history, go to JewishGen.org and read this infofile, written by Bernard I. Kouchel.

07 May 2009

President's mother baptized posthumously

According to the guidelines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, members are only supposed to enter their own relatives for posthumous baptism and other rites. Additionally, members must obtain permission from living relatives to enter non-members.

However, it is the ethical and moral responsibility of each church member to do that. Quality control on the church's part (e.g. presenting proof of documentation for the purported family relationship) is not part of the process.

If this proof had been a requirement, we would not be seeing Jewish individuals and Holocaust victims still being subjected to this disrespectful rite. Additionally, if such a documentation process would have been required, we would not be seeing Holocaust victims removed from the International Genealogical Index and then later added again. It is easy to see who Holocaust victims are as the place of death is often the name of a well-known death camp, such as Auschwitz.

According to researcher Helen Radkey of Salt Lake City, the posthumous baptism of President Barak Obama's mother - Stanley Ann Dunham who died in 1995 - was performed on June 4, 2008 in the Provo, Utah temple. The "endowment" rite was also performed on June 11 in the same location. Radkey found the record while researching in the Family History Library in SLC. A tireless researcher, she has discovered thousands of Holocaust victims' records in the IGI for whom posthumous baptism was performed in contradiction of past agreements with Holocaust survivor organizations.

Was a request for permission to perform this rite on his mother received by then-candidate Obama while he was campaigning back in June?

According to the story, neither the church (except for general comments on the continuing practice) nor the White House has commented officially on this. The SLC Tribune story did not address the guidelines that Mormons are supposed to follow before entering an individual's name for such rites.

The story is here, although it has now been picked up nationwide.

Tracing the Tribe believes that these posthumous rites are both offensive and disrespectful to the deceased - and to his or her living relatives - as it indicates that the deceased's practiced religious beliefs (while alive) and life choices (while alive) were inferior to those of the LDS church. The deceased - through an involuntary LDS posthumous rite to which he or she has not agreed - is being provided an opportunity to supposedly rectify "errors" in judgement he or she made while alive. This is insulting.

Kim Farah, an LDS Church spokeswoman, confirmed in a story for USA Today that Dunham's posthumous proxy baptism did take place. She added that these are outside of LDS policy, which requires that the person registering a proxy baptism for someone who has died can only do it for a relative.

Is Judaism inferior to the LDS church? No. Are Buddhism, Confucionism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Russian Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, other Christian denominations or Islam inferior to the LDS church? Millions of people say no, but their deceased are still subjected to involuntary rites in the hope that - in the afterlife - all these people will see the "errors" of their ways. It is insulting.

Genealogically, it is also confusing. Most genealogists know that the IGI is a database of those on whom Mormon rites have been performed. If my Jewish ancestors are in there, it is because they have been posthumously baptised by proxy and may have had additional rites performed on them as well. If my future descendants do not know what the IGI is, and see my name there, they will think that I have been baptised a Mormon. Thus, my IGI "record" will be fraudulent as I will not have changed my mind as to my beliefs, traditions, heritage, history and religion.

Do read some of the comments (hundreds at last count). One writer suggested creating a "Do Not Baptize" List, similar to the telemarketing "Do Not Call" list.

When the news broke about the posthumous baptism of famed Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal and there was a very strong negative reaction to this - Wiesenthal's record was removed from the IGI. Tracing the Tribe is sure that this is also the next step for the President's mother's baptism record. I wouldn't be surprised if it is already gone from the public database - but one cannot unring a bell in regard to private LDS records of such rites.

One comment to the USA Today story even quoted me (from some time ago) - that was a surprise:

Proxy baptisms were the focus of fierce controversy in the last decade of the twentieth century. Under intense public pressure, the LDS Church signed an agreement in 1995 with major Jewish organizations saying the Church would stop doing ordinances for deceased Jews without the written permission of all their living descendants. The LDS Church reportedly subsequently purged its own records of proxy baptisms and endowments of over 380,000 Holocaust victims. This is little comfort to many Jews whose relatives’ “fraudulent” records will reflect that they were Mormons.

“The only thing that a family researcher will see—or know, unless they’re conversant with the issue—is that their great-grandfather was a Mormon, when we all know the person lived and died as a Jew,” said Schelly Talalay Dardashti, genealogy columnist for the Jerusalem Post.

Another writer, ex-Mormon Martin Wishnatsky, was even more bitter: “The only solace I have in knowing that the Russian Communists obliterated my ancestors’ graves in Lemburg, Poland, is that no hungry Mormon name-robber, looking for records of dead persons to feed the ghoulish endowment factories, will ever be able to uncover any trace of them.”

Unfortunately, there seems to be no way to stop the disrespectful practice of posthumous baptism.

25 November 2008

Baptism: Holocaust survivors break off Mormon negotiations

Since 1992, some Jewish genealogists have been aware that the Mormons have performed posthumous baptisms and confirmations on innocent Holocaust victims and other Jews. Since then, many more people have learned of it. In 1995, the church signed a pledge saying it would no longer perform these posthumous baptisms on Holocaust victims.

It is well known in some Jewish genealogy circles that new names have been continuously added, that some names removed have again been entered and that both prominent and ordinary Jewish individuals have also been subjected to these rites.

This posting has been in draft since November 15, when I went offline due to our recent family emergency. The delay has allowed me to add in Gary Mokotoff's excellent latest article in his Nu? What's New? e-zine as a resource on this topic.

Writes Gary:

In 1992, the Jewish genealogical community discovered that 128,000 German Jews murdered in the Holocaust were posthumously baptized by the Mormon Church. The source was a memorial book called Gedenkbuch. At that time I was president of the International Association of Jewish Genealogical Societies. I informed the Church that if these baptisms were known to the general Jewish community there would be a public outcry. After two years of discussions, in the summer of 1994, the Church told me they planned to do nothing about it. Bill Gladstone, then president of the Jewish Genealogical Society of Canada, was a writer for the Jewish Telegraph Agency. He wrote an article that was published in Jewish newspapers. The reaction of the Jewish community was instantaneous and the Church started back-pedaling furiously, apologizing for what they did. It led to
the Church signing an agreement in May 1995 with a number of Jewish organizations to limit their posthumous baptism practice of Jews — of all Jews, not just Holocaust victims — to only direct ancestors of Mormons.

The last time Tracing the Tribe wrote on this issue, many comments were posted.

A history of the issue, by Bernard Kouchel, is on JewishGen here, and Gary's article includes links to others. Dedicated researcher Helen Radkey of Salt Lake City has done extensive work on uncovering inappropriately entered individuals. Gary's article links to Helen's reports here, here and here.

Many Jewish genealogists have found their own relatives listed in the International Genealogical Index (IGI), an index of all individuals who have been subjected to this rite.

Over the years, Helen has provided me with her reports and studies. She always asks why the Jewish community doesn't step up to the plate and and get involved. I have no answer for her, as I have asked the same question.

For 14 years, there have been fruitless negotiations, meetings after meetings, empty promises and continuing baptisms.

We Jews have not been the only ones questioning this distasteful procedure. In 2003, the Armenian Church publicly denounced the practice and, a few years later, the Russian Orthodox Church did the same. In May 2008, the Vatican ordered Catholic dioceses to keep member registries from Mormons so that Catholics could not be re-baptized.

While other groups made very public statements about their feelings, the Holocaust survivor community - which grows older and smaller each year - kept negotiating quietly year after year with not much happening. Jewish genealogy associations refused to make public statements out of what some called fear that the church would keep Jewish genealogical resources from them. Few other Jewish organizations thought the matter important enough to join the indignation bandwagon.

When famed Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal, however, was found to be entered in the IGI a year after his death, the Jewish world woke up and protested loudly. Supposedly, Wiesenthal was not posthumously baptized - merely cleared for the rite - and his name was removed from the IGI. Holocaust victim Anne Frank has been entered numerous times, as have other of her family members.

To bring it closer to home, some of my own relatives were entered in the IGI just because one church member decided to submit for baptism the names of all those buried in one Connecticut Jewish cemetery.

Finally, Ernest Michel - who first called major attention to the issue after finding his Holocaust victim parents listed in the IGI - has said enough is enough and ended negotiations following the last meeting on November 10.

Some in the Jewish genealogy community repeat that we shouldn't make waves as speaking loudly and publicly would somehow restrict Jewish access to genealogical records that we need. Others have called that particular attitude akin to selling one's soul for microfilm access.

And, while the church contends that the rite does not make the deceased a member of the Mormon church, the text of the proxy rite reads differently. Gary quotes the text in his article: "in the name of Jesus Christ we lay our hands upon your head, for and in behalf of [name of the deceased), who is dead and confirm you as a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and say unto you, you receive the Holy Ghost. Amen."

For many years, my own reasoning has been that while I know what the IGI is - and I have spent long hours attempting to remove inappropriately entered relatives from it - my descendants may not be aware of the real story. When they start looking for family - as I hope they will - what they will see is that family members who were lifelong Jews with no interest in other religions, are baptized Mormons. This will be completely false.

The names of my family members - whether Holocaust victims who met tragic and untimely death at the hands of Nazis or ordinary American Jews who lived long natural lives as good Jews - have been entered by unrelated church members who have proxy baptized my relatives without permission (either the deceased or living relatives).

Under church policy, members are to submit only their own relatives' names, and are also supposed to obtain permission from living relatives to enter names of others. These rules have not been followed.

It is about time that Ernie Michel has called an end to negotiations with the church. Year after year, meeting after meeting, he has been promised that the practice will end, that safety controls will be put in place. Some experts, indeed, have said over the years that the church seemed to be sorry it signed the 1995 agreement.

The major news stories say the church was surprised by Michel's statement and action. I wonder why the church thinks that 14 years of negotiation without tangible results, along with continuing baptism and re-baptism of those removed, is an impetus for more of the same?

For other sources on this topic:

A November 10 article in the Jerusalem Post also quotes Gary. The story is no longer online, but had received many viewer comments.
NEW YORK - Holocaust survivors said Monday they were abandoning negotiations with the Mormon church over its posthumous baptisms of Jews who were killed in Nazi death camps.

Survivors claim elders of the Salt Lake City-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints have refused to systemically search for and remove the names of Holocaust victims from their master genealogical database and have failed to prevent "zealots" from adding thousands of new Jewish names to the list in recent years - including thousands lifted from Yizkor books of Jews massacred at Berdichev in Ukraine.

"We are not going to continue meeting with the Mormon Church," said Auschwitz survivor Ernest Michel, head of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, who has spearheaded efforts to scrub the Mormon lists since discovering in the 1990s that his parents were among 380,000 Holocaust victims having been baptized into the Christian faith.

Gary Mokotoff, a Jewish genealogist who participated in meetings with Mormon leaders, described the negotiations as "fruitless."

"We go round and round, and they refuse to change their position," Mokotoff told The Jerusalem Post.

He and Michel claimed the church had failed to enforce rules it agreed to in 1995 to prevent Holocaust victims' names from being added and had not reprimanded those who moved to restore thousands that had been removed form baptismal lists.

"The Church's actions show disrespect for us - they revise history, intentionally or not," said Michel, who cited July correspondence with church leaders at a Manhattan news conference in which elders stated they would only remove the names of Jewish Holocaust victims upon request rather than conducting their own records search.

"Leave our six million people, all victims, alone," Michel said. "They have suffered enough."...

According to the article, the church - instead of removing names automatically - is requiring Jewish groups to continue supplying names of victims. Researcher Helen Radkey began checking the IGI for people with Jewish names after her research showed multiple baptismal listings for Anne Frank. She says the church failed to remove all 380,000 known Holocaust victims' names after the 1995 agreement and her searches of password-protected Mormon databases revealed many baptized Mormons with typically Jewish names like Solomon or Esther who had died between 1941 and 1945.
"The list problem is something the church could have cracked down on, should have cracked down on, and has not cracked down on," Radkey told the Post. She said the database could be easily compared against lists from Yad Vashem or other Holocaust clearinghouses.
Holocaust survivor Roman Kent, who appeared with Michel and Radkey, said at the press conference: "Forget the lists - it is not a numbers game. If it is even 100 people, it is too many."

Here's the JTA.org story, "Survivors say Mormons reneging on 1995 baptism pledge."
..."They tell me that my parents’ Jewishness has not been altered," said Michel’s prepared remarks for the news conference, which was held on the 70th anniversary of Kristallnacht. "But in 100 years, how will they be able to guarantee that my mother and father of blessed memory, who lived as Jews and were slaughtered by Hitler for no other reason than they were Jews, will someday not be identified as Mormon victims of the Holocaust?"...

The Genealogy Insider blog at Family Tree Magazine also carried a posting here.
...The Associated Press reported on yesterday’s American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors (AGHS) press conference. The organization claims the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints hasn’t enforced a 1995 agreement to permit its members to submit for posthumous baptism by proxy (often described as “temple work”) names of only those Holocaust victims who are direct relatives.

Posthumous baptisms by proxy are central to Mormons' faith because the practice allows families to be reunited in the afterlife. They see the baptisms as an offer that the deceased individual can refuse; many Jews view the practice as disrespectful to those who were killed for their religious beliefs.

A researcher the AGHS hired reported finding several thousand names in the
church’s genealogy databases, some submitted as recently as July.

The church removed Jews’ names after the 1995 agreement, but told the Associated Press that since then a few well-meaning members have “acted outside of policy.”...

The full AP article is at CNN.com here.

NEW YORK (AP) -- Holocaust survivors said Monday they are through trying to negotiate with the Mormon church over posthumous baptisms of Jews killed in Nazi concentration camps, saying the church has repeatedly violated a 13-year-old agreement barring the practice.

Leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints say they are making changes to their massive genealogical database that will make it more difficult for names of Holocaust victims to be entered for posthumous baptism by proxy, a rite that has been a common Mormon practice for more than a century.

But Ernest Michel, honorary chairman of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors, said that is not enough. At a news conference in New York City on Monday, he said the church also must "implement a mechanism to undo what you have done."

"Baptism of a Jewish Holocaust victim and then merely removing that name from the database is just not acceptable," said Michel, whose parents died at Auschwitz. He spoke on the 70th anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Nazi-incited riots against Jews.

"We ask you to respect us and our Judaism just as we respect your religion," Michel said in a statement released ahead of the news conference. "We ask you to leave our six million Jews, all victims of the Holocaust, alone, they suffered enough."

Michel said talks with Mormon leaders, held as recently as last week, have ended. He said his group will not sue, and that "the only thing left, therefore, is to turn to the court of public opinion."...
The full article indicates that the church kept part of the agreement by removing more than 260,000 names from the IGI, although researcher Helen Radkey says that, since 2005, there have been resubmissions and new entries of Dutch, Greek, Polish and Italian Jews.

According to Radkey, her research:
suggests that lists of Holocaust victims obtained from camp and government records are being dumped into the database. She said she has seen and recorded a sampling of several thousand entries that indicate baptisms had been conducted for Holocaust victims as recently as July.

Wickman said lists of names have been entered into the database by a small number of well-meaning members who were acting "outside of policy." He said that church monitors have identified and removed 42,000 names from the database on their own, and that the church welcomes research from others.
The church said that a new database version - New Family Search - is being tested and should reduce the problem. It is also proposing the rejuvenation of a monitoring committee set in 2005 - which has met only once since then.

Tracing the Tribe will continue to post information on this issue as information becomes available. Learn more about this issue by accessing the resources, reports and links provided above.